Compare Falcon and TurboGears
Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building web APIs, app backends and microservices. Compared to Django and Flask, it is fast, extensible, reliable, and encourages RESTful style. It doesn't come with batteries included and is ideal for applications that require a high level of customization. The fminimalist design allows developers to select the best strategies and 3rd-party packages from the Python ecosystem.
TurboGears was born as a full stack layer on top of Pylons, and many other disparate libraries and middleware. It is now a standalone WSGI web framework designed around MVC architecture inspired by Ruby on Rails and provides all the features developes need for web development. It can also run in minimal mode and act like a microframework such as Flask.
Let's see how Falcon and TurboGears compare on various factors and features and which to choose when.
Falcon
TurboGears
Overall
Type
Release Date
Adoption and Ease of Use
Used by
Performance [?]
Flexibility
Ease of Learning
Database Support
RDBMS Support
NoSQL Support
Web & Core Features
Admin Dashboard
REST Support
Security
Templating Library
Web Forms
Authentication
If you found this useful, please help us grow by sharing this article with your followers using the sharing icons. Every share or call out will help. Thank you.
Similar Comparisons
- Compare Bottle vs CherryPy
- Compare Bottle vs Fast API
- Compare Bottle vs web2py
- Compare Django vs Bottle
- Compare Django vs CherryPy
- Compare Django vs Fast API
- Compare Django vs Flask
- Compare Django vs Pyramid